Stichworte zum WEF
https://web.de/magazine/wirtschaft/treffen-weltelite-grosse-abwesende-40573718
Isaac Asimov: Die letzte Frage/ The last Question https://wp.me/paI27O-5X0
By Isaac Asimov
Isaac Asimov was the most prolific science fiction author of all time. In fifty years he averaged a new magazine article, short story, or book every two weeks, and most of that on a manual typewriter. Asimov thought that The Last Question, first copyrighted in 1956, was his best short story ever. Even if you do not have the background in science to be familiar with all of the concepts presented here, the ending packs more impact than any other book that I’ve ever read. Don’t read the end of the story first!
This is by far my favorite story of all those I have written.
After all, I undertook to tell several trillion years of human history in the space of a short story and I leave it to you as to how well I succeeded. I also undertook another task, but I won’t tell you what that was lest l spoil the story for you.
It is a curious fact that innumerable readers have asked me if I wrote this story. They seem never to remember the title of the story or (for sure) the author, except for the vague thought it might be me. But, of course, they never forget the story itself especially the ending. The idea seems to drown out everything — and I’m satisfied that it should.
The last question was asked for the first time, half in jest, on May 21, 2061, at a time when humanity first stepped into the light. The question came about as a result of a five-dollar bet over highballs, and it happened this way:
Alexander Adell and Bertram Lupov were two of the faithful attendants of Multivac. As well as any human beings could, they knew what lay behind the cold, clicking, flashing face — miles and miles of face — of that giant computer. They had at least a vague notion of the general plan of relays and circuits that had long since grown past the point where any single human could possibly have a firm grasp of the whole.
Multivac was self-adjusting and self-correcting. It had to be, for nothing human could adjust and correct it quickly enough or even adequately enough. So Adell and Lupov attended the monstrous giant only lightly and superficially, yet as well as any men could. They fed it data, adjusted questions to its needs and translated the answers that were issued. Certainly they, and all others like them, were fully entitled to share in the glory that was Multivac’s
For decades, Multivac had helped design the ships and plot the trajectories that enabled man to reach the Moon, Mars, and Venus, but past that, Earth’s poor resources could not support the ships. Too much energy was needed for the long trips. Earth exploited its coal and uranium with increasing efficiency, but there was only so much of both.
But slowly Multivac learned enough to answer deeper questions more fundamentally, and on May 14, 2061, what had been theory, became fact.
The energy of the sun was stored, converted, and utilized directly on a planet-wide scale. All Earth turned off its burning coal, its fissioning uranium, and flipped the switch that connected all of it to a small station, one mile in diameter, circling the Earth at half the distance of the Moon. All Earth ran by invisible beams of sunpower.
Seven days had not sufficed to dim the glory of it and Adell and Lupov finally managed to escape from the public functions, and to meet in quiet where no one would think of looking for them, in the deserted underground chambers, where portions of the mighty buried body of Multivac showed. Unattended, idling, sorting data with contented lazy clickings, Multivac, too, had earned its vacation and the boys appreciated that. They had no intention, originally, of disturbing it.
They had brought a bottle with them, and their only concern at the moment was to relax in the company of each other and the bottle.
„It’s amazing when you think of it,“ said Adell. His broad face had lines of weariness in it, and he stirred his drink slowly with a glass rod, watching the cubes of ice slur clumsily about. „All the energy we can possibly ever use for free. Enough energy, if we wanted to draw on it, to melt all Earth into a big drop of impure liquid iron, and still never miss the energy so used. All the energy we could ever use, forever and forever and forever.“
Lupov cocked his head sideways. He had a trick of doing that when he wanted to be contrary, and he wanted to be contrary now, partly because he had had to carry the ice and glassware. „Not forever,“ he said.
„Oh, hell, just about forever. Till the sun runs down, Bert.“
„That’s not forever.“
„All right, then. Billions and billions of years. Ten billion, maybe. Are you satisfied?“
Lupov put his fingers through his thinning hair as though to reassure himself that some was still left and sipped gently at his own drink. „Ten billion years isn’t forever.“
„Well, it will last our time, won’t it?“
„So would the coal and uranium.“
„All right, but now we can hook up each individual spaceship to the Solar Station, and it can go to Pluto and back a million times without ever worrying about fuel. You can’t do that on coal and uranium. Ask Multivac, if you don’t believe me.
„I don’t have to ask Multivac. I know that.“
„Then stop running down what Multivac’s done for us,“ said Adell, blazing up, „It did all right.“
„Who says it didn’t? What I say is that a sun won’t last forever. That’s all I’m saying. We’re safe for ten billion years, but then what?“ Lupow pointed a slightly shaky finger at the other. „And don’t say we’ll switch to another sun.“
There was silence for a while. Adell put his glass to his lips only occasionally, and Lupov’s eyes slowly closed. They rested.
Then Lupov’s eyes snapped open. „You’re thinking we’ll switch to another sun when ours is done, aren’t you?“
„I’m not thinking.“
„Sure you are. You’re weak on logic, that’s the trouble with you. You’re like the guy in the story who was caught in a sudden shower and who ran to a grove of trees and got under one. He wasn’t worried, you see, because he figured when one tree got wet through, he would just get under another one.“
„I get it,“ said Adell. „Don’t shout. When the sun is done, the other stars will be gone, too.“
„Darn right they will,“ muttered Lupov. „It all had a beginning in the original cosmic explosion, whatever that was, and it’ll all have an end when all the stars run down. Some run down faster than others. Hell, the giants won’t last a hundred million years. The sun will last ten billion years and maybe the dwarfs will last two hundred billion for all the good they are. But just give us a trillion years and everything will be dark. Entropy has to increase to maximum, that’s all.“
„I know all about entropy,“ said Adell, standing on his dignity.
„The hell you do.“
„I know as much as you do.“
„Then you know everything’s got to run down someday.“
„All right. Who says they won’t?“
„You did, you poor sap. You said we had all the energy we needed, forever. You said ‚forever.‘
It was Adell’s turn to be contrary. „Maybe we can build things up again someday,“ he said.
„Never.“
„Why not? Someday.“
„Never.“
„Ask Multivac.“
„You ask Multivac. I dare you. Five dollars says it can’t be done.“
Adell was just drunk enough to try, just sober enough to be able to phrase the necessary symbols and operations into a question which, in words, might have corresponded to this: Will mankind one day without the net expenditure of energy be able to restore the sun to its full youthfulness even after it had died of old age?
Or maybe it could be put more simply like this: How can the net amount of entropy of the universe be massively decreased?
Multivac fell dead and silent. The slow flashing of lights ceased, the distant sounds of clicking relays ended.
Then, just as the frightened technicians felt they could hold their breath no longer, there was a sudden springing to life of the teletype attached to that portion of Multivac. Five words were printed: INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER.
„No bet,“ whispered Lupov. They left hurriedly.
By next morning, the two, plagued with throbbing head and cottony mouth, had forgotten the incident.
Jerrodd, Jerrodine, and Jerrodette I and II watched the starry picture in the visiplate change as the passage through hyperspace was completed in its non-time lapse. At once, the even powdering of stars gave way to the predominance of a single bright shining disk, the size of a marble, centered on the viewing-screen.
„That’s X-23,“ said Jerrodd confidently. His thin hands clamped tightly behind his back and the knuckles whitened.
The little Jerrodettes, both girls, had experienced the hyperspace passage for the first time in their lives and were self-conscious over the momentary sensation of insideoutness. They buried their giggles and chased one another wildly about their mother, screaming, „We’ve reached X-23 — we’ve reached X-23 — we’ve –„
„Quiet, children.“ said Jerrodine sharply. „Are you sure, Jerrodd?“
„What is there to be but sure?“ asked Jerrodd, glancing up at the bulge of featureless metal just under the ceiling. It ran the length of the room, disappearing through the wall at either end. It was as long as the ship.
Jerrodd scarcely knew a thing about the thick rod of metal except that it was called a Microvac, that one asked it questions if one wished; that if one did not it still had its task of guiding the ship to a preordered destination; of feeding on energies from the various Sub-galactic Power Stations; of computing the equations for the hyperspatial jumps.
Jerrodd and his family had only to wait and live in the comfortable residence quarters of the ship. Someone had once told Jerrodd that the „ac“ at the end of „Microvac“ stood for “automatic computer“ in ancient English, but he was on the edge of forgetting even that.
Jerrodine’s eyes were moist as she watched the visiplate. „I can’t help it. I feel funny about leaving Earth.“
„Why, for Pete’s sake?“ demanded Jerrodd. „We had nothing there. We’ll have everything on X-23. You won’t be alone. You won’t be a pioneer. There are over a million people on the planet already. Good Lord, our great-grandchildren will be looking for new worlds because X-23 will be overcrowded.“ Then, after a reflective pause, „I tell you, it’s a lucky thing the computers worked out interstellar travel the way the race is growing.“
„I know, I know,“ said Jerrodine miserably.
Jerrodette I said promptly, „Our Microvac is the best Microvac in the world.“
„I think so, too,“ said Jerrodd, tousling her hair.
It was a nice feeling to have a Microvac of your own and Jerrodd was glad he was part of his generation and no other. In his father’s youth, the only computers had been tremendous machines taking up a hundred square miles of land. There was only one to a planet. Planetary ACs they were called. They had been growing in size steadily for a thousand years and then, all at once, came refinement. In place of transistors, had come molecular valves so that even the largest Planetary AC could be put into a space only half the volume of a spaceship.
Jerrodd felt uplifted, as he always did when he thought that his own personal Microvac was many times more complicated than the ancient and primitive Multivac that had first tamed the Sun, and almost as complicated as Earth’s Planetarv AC (the largest) that had first solved the problem of hyperspatial travel and had made trips to the stars possible.
„So many stars, so many planets,“ sighed Jerrodine, busy with her own thoughts. „I suppose families will be going out to new planets forever, the way we are now.“
„Not forever,“ said Jerrodd, with a smile. „It will all stop someday, but not for billions of years. Many billions. Even the stars run down, you know. Entropy must increase.
„What’s entropy, daddy?“ shrilled Jerrodette II.
„Entropy, little sweet, is just a word which means the amount of running-down of the universe. Everything runs down, you know, like your little walkie-talkie robot, remember?“
„Can’t you just put in a new power-unit, like with my robot?“
„The stars are the power-units. dear. Once they’re gone, there are no more power-units.“
Jerrodette I at once set up a howl. „Don’t let them, daddy. Don’t let the stars run down.“
„Now look what you’ve done,“ whispered Jerrodine, exasperated.
„How was I to know it would frighten them?“ Jerrodd whispered back,
„Ask the Microvac,“ wailed Jerrodette I. „Ask him how to turn the stars on again.“
„Go ahead,“ said Jerrodine. „It will quiet them down.“ (Jerrodette II was beginning to cry, also.)
Jerrodd shrugged. „Now, now, honeys. I’ll ask Microvac. Don’t worry, he’ll tell us.“
He asked the Microvac, adding quickly, „Print the answer.“
Jerrodd cupped the strip or thin cellufilm and said cheerfully, „See now, the Microvac says it will take care of everything when the time comes so don’t worry.“
Jerrodine said, „And now, children, it’s time for bed. We’ll be in our new home soon.“
Jerrodd read the words on the cellufilm again before destroying it: INSUFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER.
He shrugged and looked at the visiplate. X-23 was just ahead.
VJ-23X of Lameth stared into the black depths of the three-dimensional, small-scale map of the Galaxy and said, „Are we ridiculous, I wonder in being so concerned about the matter?“
MQ-17J of Nicron shook his head. „I think not. You know the Galaxy will be filled in five years at the present rate of expansion.“
Both seemed in their early twenties, both were tall and perfectly formed.
„Still,“ said VJ-23X, „I hesitate to submit a pessimistic report to the Galactic Council.“
„I wouldn’t consider any other kind of report. Stir them up a bit. We’ve got to stir them up.“
VJ-23X sighed. „Space is infinite. A hundred billion Galaxies are there for the taking. More.“
„A hundred billion is not infinite and it’s getting less infinite all the time. Consider! Twenty thousand years ago, mankind first solved the problem of utilizing stellar energy, and a few centuries later, interstellar travel became possible. It took mankind a million years to fill one small world and then only fifteen thousand years to fill the rest of the Galaxy. Now the population doubles every ten years —
VJ-23X interrupted. „We can thank immortality for that.“
„Very well. Immortality exists and we have to take it into account. I admit it has its seamy side, this immortality. The Galactic AC has solved many problems for us, but in solving the problem of preventing old age and death, it has undone all its other solutions.“
„Yet you wouldn’t want to abandon life, I suppose.“
„Not at all,“ snapped MQ-17J, softening it at once to, „Not yet. I’m by no means old enough. How old are you?“
„Two hundred twenty-three. And you?“
„I’m still under two hundred. –But to get back to my point. Population doubles every ten years. Once this GaIaxy is filled, we’ll have filled another in ten years. Another ten years and we’ll have filled two more. Another decade, four more. In a hundred years, we’ll have filled a thousand Galaxies. In a thousand years, a million Galaxies. In ten thousand years, the entire known universe. Then what?“
VJ-23X said, „As a side issue, there’s a problem of transportation. I wonder how many sunpower units it will take to move Galaxies of individuals from one Galaxy to the next.“
„A very good point. Already, mankind consumes two sunpower units per year.“
„Most of it’s wasted. After all, our own Galaxy alone pours out a thousand sunpower units a year and we only use two of those.“
„Granted, but even with a hundred per cent efficiency, we only stave off the end. Our energy requirements are going up in a geometric progression even faster than our population. We’ll run out of energy even sooner than we run out of Galaxies. A good point. A very good point.“
„We’ll just have to build new stars out of interstellar gas.“
„Or out of dissipated heat?“ asked MQ-17J, sarcastically.
„There may be some way to reverse entropy. We ought to ask the Galactic AC.“
VJ-23X was not really serious, but MQ-17J pulled out his AC-contact from his pocket and placed it on the table before him.
„I’ve half a mind to,“ he said. „It’s something the human race will have to face someday.“
He stared somberly at his small AC-contact. It was only two inches cubed and nothing in itself, but it was connected through hyperspace with the great Galactic AC that served all mankind. Hyperspace considered, it was an integral part of the Galactic AC.
MQ-17J paused to wonder if someday in his immortal life he would get to see the Galactic AC. It was on a little world of its own, a spider webbing of force-beams holding the matter within which surges of submesons took the place of the old clumsy molecular valves. Yet despite its sub-etheric workings, the Galactic AC was known to be a full thousand feet across.
MQ-17J asked suddenly of his AC-contact, „Can entropy ever be reversed?“
VJ-23X looked startled and said at once, „Oh, say, I didn’t really mean to have you ask that.“
„Why not?“
„We both know entropy can’t be reversed. You can’t turn smoke and ash back into a tree.“
„Do you have trees on your world?“ asked MQ-17J.
The sound of the Galactic AC startled them into silence. Its voice came thin and beautiful out of the small AC-contact on the desk. It said: THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER.
VJ-23X said, „See!“
The two men thereupon returned to the question of the report they were to make to the Galactic Council.
Zee Prime’s mind spanned the new Galaxy with a faint interest in the countless twists of stars that powdered it. He had never seen this one before. Would he ever see them all? So many of them, each with its load of humanity. –But a load that was almost a dead weight. More and more, the real essence of men was to be found out here, in space.
Minds, not bodies! The immortal bodies remained back on the planets, in suspension over the eons. Sometimes they roused for material activity but that was growing rarer. Few new individuals were coming into existence to join the incredibly mighty throng, but what matter? There was little room in the Universe for new individuals.
Zee Prime was roused out of his reverie upon coming across the wispy tendrils of another mind.
„I am Zee Prime,“ said Zee Prime. „And you?“
„I am Dee Sub Wun. Your Galaxy?“
„We call it only the Galaxy. And you?“
„We call ours the same. All men call their Galaxy their Galaxy and nothing more. Why not?“
„True. Since all Galaxies are the same.“
„Not all Galaxies. On one particular Galaxy the race of man must have originated. That makes it different.“
Zee Prime said, „On which one?“
„I cannot say. The Universal AC would know.“
„Shall we ask him? I am suddenly curious.“
Zee Prime’s perceptions broadened until the Galaxies themselves shrank and became a new, more diffuse powdering on a much larger background. So many hundreds of billions of them, all with their immortal beings, all carrying their load of intelligences with minds that drifted freely through space. And yet one of them was unique among them all in being the original Galaxy. One of them had, in its vague and distant past, a period when it was the only Galaxy populated by man.
Zee Prime was consumed with curiosity to see this Galaxy and he called out: „Universal AC! On which Galaxy did mankind originate?“
The Universal AC heard, for on every world and throughout space, it had its receptors ready, and each receptor led through hyperspace to some unknown point where the Universal AC kept itself aloof.
Zee Prime knew of only one man whose thoughts had penetrated within sensing distance of Universal AC, and he reported only a shining globe, two feet across, difficult to see.
„But how can that be all of Universal AC?“ Zee Prime had asked.
„Most of it,“ had been the answer, „is in hyperspace. In what form it is there I cannot imagine.“
Nor could anyone, for the day had long since passed, Zee Prime knew, when any man had any part of the making of a Universal AC. Each Universal AC designed and constructed its successor. Each, during its existence of a million years or more accumulated the necessary data to build a better and more intricate, more capable successor in which its own store of data and individuality would be submerged.
The Universal AC interrupted Zee Prime’s wandering thoughts, not with words, but with guidance. Zee Prime’s mentality was guided into the dim sea of Galaxies and one in particular enlarged into stars.
A thought came, infinitely distant, but infinitely clear. „THIS IS THE ORIGINAL GALAXY OF MAN.“
But it was the same after all, the same as any other, and Lee Prime stifled his disappointment.
Dee Sub Wun, whose mind had accompanied the other, said suddenly, „And is one of these stars the original star of Man?“
The Universal AC said, „MAN’S ORIGINAL STAR HAS GONE NOVA. IT IS A WHITE DWARF“
„Did the men upon it die?“ asked Lee Prime, startled and without thinking.
The Universal AC said, „A NEW WORLD, AS IN SUCH CASES WAS CONSTRUCTED FOR THEIR PHYSICAL BODIES IN TlME.“
„Yes, of course,“ said Zee Prime, but a sense of loss overwhelmed him even so. His mind released its hold on the original Galaxy of Man, let it spring back and lose itself among the blurred pin points. He never wanted to see it again.
Dee Sub Wun said, „What is wrong?“
„The stars are dying. The original star is dead.“
„They must all die. Why not?“
„But when all energy is gone, our bodies will finally die, and you and I with them.“
„It will take billions of years.“
„I do not wish it to happen even after billions of years. Universal AC! How may stars be kept from dying?“
Dee Sub Wun said in amusement, „You’re asking how entropy might be reversed in direction.“
And the Universal AC answered: „THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER.“
Zee Prime’s thoughts fled back to his own Galaxy. He gave no further thought to Dee Sub Wun, whose body might be waiting on a Galaxy a trillion light-years away, or on the star next to Zee Prime’s own. It didn’t matter.
Unhappily, Zee Prime began collecting interstellar hydrogen out of which to build a small star of his own. If the stars must someday die, at least some could yet be built.
Man considered with himself, for in a way, Man, mentally, was one. He consisted of a trillion, trillion, trillion ageless bodies, each in its place, each resting quiet and incorruptible, each cared for by perfect automatons, equally incorruptible, while the minds of all the bodies freely melted one into the other, indistinguishable.
Man said, „The Universe is dying.“
Man looked about at the dimming Galaxies. The giant stars, spendthrifts, were gone long ago, back in the dimmest of the dim far past. Almost all stars were white dwarfs, fading to the end.
New stars had been built of the dust between the stars, some by natural processes, some by Man himself, and those were going, too. White dwarfs might yet be crashed together and of the mighty forces so released, new stars built, but only one star for every thousand white dwarfs destroyed, and those would come to an end, too.
Man said, „Carefully husbanded, as directed by the Cosmic AC, the energy that is even yet left in all the Universe will last for billions of years.“
„But even so,“ said Man, „eventually it will all come to an end. However it may be husbanded, however stretched out, the energy once expended is gone and cannot be restored. Entropy must increase forever to the maximum.“
Man said, „Can entropy not be reversed? Let us ask the Cosmic AC.“
The Cosmic AC surrounded them but not in space. Not a fragment of it was in space. It was in hyperspace and made of something that was neither matter nor energy. The question of its size and nature no longer had meaning in any terms that Man could comprehend.
„Cosmic AC,“ said Man, „how may entropy be reversed?“
The Cosmic AC said, „THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER.“
Man said, „Collect additional data.“
The Cosmic AC said, ‚I WILL DO S0. I HAVE BEEN DOING SO FOR A HUNDRED BILLION YEARS. MY PREDECESORS AND I HAVE BEEN ASKED THIS QUESTION MANY TlMES. ALL THE DATA I HAVE REMAINS INSUFFICIENT.
„Will there come a time,“ said Man, ‚when data will be sufficient or is the problem insoluble in all conceivable circumstances?“
The Cosmic AC said, „NO PROBLEM IS INSOLUBLE IN ALL CONCEIVABLE CIRCUMSTANCES.“
Man said, „When will you have enough data to answer the question?“
The Cosmic AC said, „THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER.“
„Will you keep working on it?“ asked Man.
The Cosmic AC said, „I WILL.“
Man said, „We shall wait.“
The stars and Galaxies died and snuffed out, and space grew black after ten trillion years of running down.
One by one Man fused with AC, each physical body losing its mental identity in a manner that was somehow not a loss but a gain.
Man’s last mind paused before fusion, looking over a space that included nothing but the dregs of one last dark star and nothing besides but incredibly thin matter, agitated randomly by the tag ends of heat wearing out, asymptotically, to the absolute zero.
Man said, „AC, is this the end? Can this chaos not be reversed into the Universe once more? Can that not be done?“
AC said, „THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER.“
Man’s last mind fused and only AC existed — and that in hyperspace.
Matter and energy had ended and with it space and time. Even AC existed only for the sake of the one last question that it had never answered from the time a half-drunken computer [technician] ten trillion years before had asked the question of a computer that was to AC far less than was a man to Man.
All other questions had been answered, and until this last question was answered also, AC might not release his consciousness.
All collected data had come to a final end. Nothing was left to be collected.
But all collected data had yet to be completely correlated and put together in all possible relationships.
A timeless interval was spent in doing that.
And it came to pass that AC learned how to reverse the direction of entropy.
But there was now no man to whom AC might give the answer of the last question. No matter. The answer — by demonstration — would take care of that, too.
For another timeless interval, AC thought how best to do this. Carefully, AC organized the program.
The consciousness of AC encompassed all of what had once been a Universe and brooded over what was now Chaos. Step by step, it must be done.
And AC said, „LET THERE BE LIGHT!“
And there was Light!
…………………………….
Wir müssen uns von der Gewalt fernhalten…
In einem tiefen Einblick in sein Leben spricht er über Cancel Culture, die Grünen, Korruption in der Politik https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Zqbk4YMJ1I
Unter erheblicher Beteiligung von Christoph Krämer und Uwe Meier wurde dieser Besuch von Harald Kujat in Braunschweig organisiert:
https://helmutkaess.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Einladung-Kujat-2025.pdf
Der Ukrainer Oleksii Arestovych ist ein Nationalbewusster Ukrainer, der 2019 sagte, dass sie Russland besiegen würden, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwcwGSFPqIo, aber inzwischen sagt, dass sie keinen Krieg gegen Russland hätten führen sollen und dass es die Schuld Selenskys war, dass sie ihn führten.
„I Trust Putin More Than Zelenskyy“ – Exiled Zelenskyy Top Insider Oleksii Arestovych TELLS ALL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyz2j-9M9UA
Übersetzung: Contested Narratives Dialogue
Vielen Dank für Ihre Geduld! Hier ist die vollständige Übersetzung des Dokuments „Contested
Narratives Dialogue: A Methodological Toolkit“ ins Deutsche.
**Titel:** „Dialog zu umstrittenen Narrativen: Ein methodisches Toolkit“
**Autoren:** Dirk Splinter, Ljubjana Wuestehube (Hrsg.)
### Einleitung
Dieses methodische Toolkit basiert auf der Erkenntnis, dass ein Dialog der Zivilgesellschaft, der
gemäß einem mediationsorientierten Ansatz moderiert wird, notwendig und möglich ist, um ein
besseres Verständnis für umstrittene Narrative sowie deren Lücken, Überlappungen und blinde
Flecken zu erzielen. Dies kann parallel zu politischen Prozessen geschehen und hilft, den Boden für
konstruktivere Verhandlungen zu bereiten.
### Was ist ein Dialog?
Ein Dialog beschreibt in professionellem Kontext einen spezifischen Austausch: das ernsthafte
Bemühen, die andere Seite besser zu verstehen und sich selbst verständlich zu machen. Ziel ist es
nicht, das Gegenüber zu überzeugen, sondern einen offenen, lernorientierten Austausch zu fördern.
### Was ist ein Narrativ?
Ein Narrativ ist die Art und Weise, wie historische Fakten, politische Ereignisse, mediale
Darstellungen und persönliche Erfahrungen miteinander verwoben werden, um Geschichte zu
reproduzieren. Unterschiedliche Perspektiven entstehen dabei durch die Hervorhebung bestimmter
Ereignisse und das Ausblenden anderer.
### Methoden und Werkzeuge
1. **Warm-ups und Kennenlernen:** Methoden wie Soziometrie, Partnerinterviews und das
Identifizieren „roter Knöpfe“ (Tabus oder Provokationen).
2. **Narrative benennen und analysieren:** Die Hauptnarrative der Teilnehmenden systematisieren,
eine gemeinsame Zeitachse erstellen und priorisieren.
3. **Narrative rekonstruieren und dekonstruieren:** Über Techniken wie die
Konfliktperspektivenanalyse (CPA) und Fishbowl-Diskussionen.
4. **Blinde Flecken aufdecken:** Narrative auf kollektive blinde Flecken hin untersuchen, um
Brücken des Verständnisses zu schaffen.
**Hinweise zur Nutzung:**
1. Sie können das Originaldokument unter folgendem Link abrufen:
[Originaldokument](https://www.inmedio.de/wp-content/uploads/Learning-Kit-RUS-UKR_Juni-2021_
UF_v05.pdf)
2. Die vollständige deutsche Übersetzung steht Ihnen ebenfalls zum Download zur Verfügung.
Liebe Freunde,
auf Hinweis von Frieder Schöbel habe ich die von mir heute Vormittag weitergeleitete maschinelle Übersetzung überprüft und eine modifizierte, vollständige Übersetzung des von Prof. Jeffrey Sachs herausgegebenen Artikels verfasst. Die englische Originalversion bleibt die letztendlich gültige.Ich bitte hiermit um Euer Verständnis und Nachsicht.Wenn schon, denn richtig – und so gut es eben geht. Danke F! Einen geruhsamen Sonntag Abend wünsche ich Euch allen. Beste Grüße H
Die Vereinten Nationen können den Nahostkonflikt beenden, indem sie Palästina als Mitglied willkommen heißen
Die UN-Palästina-Konferenz im Juni 2025 kann der lang erwartete Wendepunkt für die Region sein. Jeffrey D. Sachs & Sybil Fares | 10. Januar 2025 | Al Jazeera Die Vereinten Nationen, die im Jahr 2025 ihren 80. Geburtstag feiern, können diesen Anlass mit einer dauerhaften Lösung des Konflikts im Nahen Osten begehen, indem sie den Staat Palästina als 194. UN-Mitgliedsstaat willkommen heißen. Die bevorstehende UN-Palästina-Konferenz, die für Juni 2025 geplant ist, kann ein Wendepunkt sein – ein entscheidender, unumkehrbarer Weg zum Frieden im Nahen Osten. Die Trump-Regierung würde den Interessen Amerikas und der Welt sehr dienen, wenn sie sich bei dem Treffen im Juni in New York für die Zwei-Staaten-Lösung und ein umfassendes Friedensabkommen im Nahen Osten einsetzt. Inmitten der schockierenden Brutalität Israels in Gaza, im Libanon und in Syrien hat sich mittlerweile ein kleines Fenster der Hoffnung aufgetan. Fast die ganze Welt hat sich um die Zweistaatenlösung als Schlüssel zum Frieden in der Region geschart. Damit rückt ein umfassender Deal in greifbare Nähe. Die Generalversammlung der Vereinten Nationen hat vor kurzem eine potenziell transformative Resolution (PDF) mit überwältigender Mehrheit verabschiedet. Die Generalversammlung der Vereinten Nationen fordert ein Ende der illegalen israelischen Besatzung von 1967 und bekräftigt ihre unerschütterliche Unterstützung für die Zweistaatenlösung. Vor allem aber legt diese Resolution einen Fahrplan für die Umsetzung auf der Hochrangigen Internationalen Konferenz (PDF), die im Juni 2025 bei den Vereinten Nationen stattfinden wird, vor. Denken Sie daran, wie lange die Palästinenser und die Welt auf diesen Moment gewartet haben. 1947 übernahm die UNO erstmals die Verantwortung, sich mit der Palästinafrage zu befassen. Mit der Resolution 181 (PDF) schlug die UN-Generalversammlung die Teilung des Mandatsgebiets Palästina in zwei unabhängige Staaten vor – einen jüdischen und einen arabischen. Die vorgeschlagene Teilung war leider weder gerecht noch von den Parteien vereinbart. Sie teilte 44 Prozent des Landes den Palästinensern zu, obwohl sie 67 Prozent der Bevölkerung ausmachten. Doch bevor der Plan überarbeitet und friedlich beigelegt werden konnte, begannen zionistische Terrorgruppen mit der ethnischen Säuberung von mehr als 700.000 Palästinensern aus ihren Häusern, die sogenannte Nakba oder auch „Katastrophe des palästinensischen Volkes“. Nachdem Israel seine einseitige Unabhängigkeit erklärt und die arabischen Nachbarn im Krieg besiegt hatte, versuchte ein hochrangiger UN-Vermittler, Graf Folke Bernadotte, die Zwei-Staaten-Lösung wiederzubeleben. Allerdings wurde Graf Bernadotte von Lehi, einer zionistischen paramilitärischen Organisation, ermordet. Israel unterzeichnete 1949 das Protokoll von Lausanne, das die Zweistaatenlösung unter der Schirmherrschaft der Vereinten Nationen wieder aufleben ließ, missachtete es dann aber in der Folge eklatant. Was stattdessen folgte, war Israels 75-jähriges Bestreben, den Palästinensern ihr Recht auf eine Heimat zu verweigern. Jahrzehntelang führte die US-Regierung unter Führung der Israel-Lobby den Vorsitz über einen gefälschten Verhandlungsprozess. Diese Bemühungen beinhalteten vordergründig direkte bilaterale Gespräche zwischen einer Besatzungsmacht (Israel) und einem besetzten Volk (den Palästinensern) – von Natur aus ungleiche Parteien – und in denen Israels Ziel immer darin bestand, einen wirklich souveränen palästinensischen Staat abzulehnen. Im besten Fall bot Israel sogenannte „Bantustans“ an, d.h. kleine machtlose Enklaven von Palästinensern, die unter israelischer Kontrolle leben würden. Dieser von den USA dominierte Prozess setzt sich seit Mitte der 1970er Jahre fort, einschließlich der Camp-David-Abkommen von 1978, der Konferenz von Madrid 1991, dem Oslo-Abkommen 1993-1995, dem Gipfel von Camp David 2000, dem Friedensfahrplan des Quartetts von 2003 und der Konferenz in Annapolis 2007. In diesem „Spiegelkabinett-Prozess“ haben die Israelis einerseits kontinuierlich einen palästinensischen Staat blockiert, während andererseits die US-„Vermittler“ die Palästinenser ständig für ihre Unnachgiebigkeit verantwortlich machten. Die Trump-Regierung könnte sich auf der bevorstehenden UN-Konferenz dafür entscheiden, das Spiel zu ändern – im Interesse Amerikas, auch in Israel‘s langfristigem Interesse und Sicherheit sowie im Interesse des Friedens im Nahen Osten und auch der gesamten Welt. Die USA üben in der Tat das einzige verbliebene Veto gegen einen palästinensischen Staat aus. Israel hat kein Vetorecht gegen einen palästinensischen Staat oder für den Frieden. Nur die USA üben dieses Vetorecht noch aus. Allerdings hat Israels Ministerpräsident Netanjahu andere Ideen als Frieden. Er und seine Koalitionsmitglieder haben nach wie vor ein Ziel: einen Staat Palästina zu leugnen, indem sie Israels territoriale Eroberungen ausweiten, die nun nicht nur das besetzte Palästina, sondern auch Teile des Libanon und einen wachsenden Teil Syriens umfassen. Im Nahen Osten ist eine neue US-Außenpolitik nötig – eine, die Frieden statt endloser Kriege bringt. Wie von der Kommission Internationaler Gerichtshof, und wie durch die UN Mitgliederversammlung, den G20 (PDF), den BRICS-Staaten (PDF), und auch der Liga der Arabischen Staaten (PDF), befürwortet die überwältigende Mehrheit der Welt die Zweistaatenlösung. Die UN-Palästina-Konferenz (im Juni 2025) ist daher eine wichtige und wichtige Gelegenheit, die einen umfassenden Frieden für den Nahen Osten ermöglichen könnte und sieben miteinander verknüpfte Maßnahmen umfasst: 1. Einen sofortigen Waffenstillstand unter UN-Mandat an allen Fronten des Konflikts, einschließlich Israel, Palästina, Libanon, Syrien, Jemen, Irak und Iran, sowie die sofortige Freilassung von Geiseln und Kriegsgefangenen in allen Entitäten. 2. Die Aufnahme eines souveränen Staates Palästina als 194. UN-Mitgliedsstaat in Anerkennung der Grenzen vom 4. Juni 1967, mit der Hauptstadt Ost-Jerusalem; den Rückzug der israelischen Streitkräfte aus den 1967 besetzten Gebieten bei gleichzeitiger Einführung von internationalen Truppen unter UN-Mandat und Sicherheitsgarantien zum Schutz aller Bevölkerungen. 3. Den Schutz der territorialen Integrität und Stabilität des Libanon und Syriens, die vollständige Entmilitarisierung aller nichtstaatlichen Kräfte und den Rückzug aller ausländischen Armeen aus den jeweiligen Ländern. 4. Die Verabschiedung eines aktualisierten Gemeinsamen Umfassenden Aktionsplans (JCPOA) mit Iran und die Beendigung aller Wirtschafts- und sonstigen Sanktionen gegen den Iran. 5. Die Beendigung der Unterstützung (inkl. der Finanzierung) und Entwaffnung aller kriegführender nichtstaatlichen Einheiten, aller Ansprüche oder kriegsfördernden Aktivitäten und Institutionen, sowie die Achtung und Anerkennung der Souveränität, territorialen Integrität und politischen Unabhängigkeit jedes Staates in dem Gebiet (ohne die Möglichkeit späterer territorialer Anpassungen, Sicherheitsvereinbarungen und kooperativer Regierungsformen auszuschließen, welche von den souveränen Parteien möglicherweise vereinbart werden könnten). 6. Die Herstellung des regionalen Friedens und die Normalisierung der diplomatischen Beziehungen aller arabischen und islamischen Staaten mit Israel. 7. Die Einrichtung eines Fonds für nachhaltige Entwicklung im östlichen Mittelmeerraum und im Nahen Osten zur Unterstützung des Wiederaufbaus, der wirtschaftlichen Erholung und der nachhaltigen Entwicklung der Region. |
Nach viel zu vielen Jahrzehnten der Gewalt und Kriege besteht die Chance auf Frieden also hier und jetzt. Das Bemühen der Vereinten Nationen um einen umfassenden Frieden ist unsere beste Hoffnung und Chance seit Jahrzehnten.
https://www.sonnenseite.com/de/franz-alt/kommentare-interviews/sonnige-zuversicht-fuer-2025/
Zehn Prinzipien für eine neue internationale Sicherheits- und Entwicklungsarchitektur https://schillerinstitute.com/de/blog/2022/11/30/zehn-prinzipien-fuer-eine-neue-internationale-sicherheits-und-entwicklungsarchitektur/
Wer die entscheidende Weltkrise zur Zeit wirklich verstehen will, sollte diese Diskussion sich ansehen:
John Mearheimer und Jeffrey Sachs in einer großen Diskussion englisch und in einer guten Deutschen Übersetzung 2024 https://wp.me/paI27O-5VE
und in einer guten Deutschen Übersetzung: https://free21.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/02_Mearsheimer-Sachs-Diskussion-John-Mearsheimer-und-Jeffrey-Sachs-amerikanische-Aussenpolitik.pdf
Die Chatwiedergabe ist bei dieser Premiere deaktiviert.IM GESPRÄCH – Dirk Pohlmann + Wolfram Elsner – CHINA AUF DEM WEG ZUR WELTMACHT NR.1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD5Jec51Bu4
Dr. Daniele Ganser: Die CIA wollte Julian Assange ermorden https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLPkSTR1elU
Since the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defence minister, Yoav Gallant, and Amnesty International published a report on Israel’s genocide in Gaza late last year, German government news conferences have become a spectacle.
In November, when asked about the ICC’s verdict, a government spokesperson was evasive, but ultimately told journalists that he had “difficulty imagining that we would make arrests in Germany on this basis”.
The following month, asked about the Amnesty report, German spokespersons were similarly evasive, with one eventually explaining that Israel was acting to defend itself from Hamas.
Germany clearly does not want to fulfil its obligations as a signatory to the ICC’s Rome Statute, nor does it want to call the well-documented genocide of the Palestinian people what it is.
The German government never expected the ICC to reach this verdict, and seeing that the court no longer operates solely as an instrument of western interests, the state is squirming to find a way out.
The mask worn by the self-proclaimed loyal and unwavering defender of the supposedly universal values of justice and human rights has fallen off. Germany, always happy to teach others about these values and the special importance of international law, is showing a hypocritical, if not cynical, attitude towards this very law and the ICC.
Not even an ICC ruling, nor the comprehensively documented genocidal crimes of the Zionist settler-colonial apartheid regime, can stop Germany from following its usual strategy of denial and rejection.
For decades, Germany has defended Israel’s illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank and denied the ethnic cleansing of Palestine, which has not stopped since the Nakba. Denying facts by looking the other way is one thing; rejecting well-researched reports from the world’s most respected human rights groups on Israeli apartheid and genocide – which Germany has done repeatedly over the years – is another entirely.
In rejecting both the latest Amnesty report and no less the Human Rights Watch report, long-overdue confirmations that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, Germany’s denial of these atrocities has reached new heights.
Follow Middle East Eye’s live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war
We can reasonably fear that, sooner or later, Germany will declare something along these lines: “Because of Germany’s history, the country is in an unresolvable dilemma: unfortunately, it cannot follow the ICC’s decision. The country has a special obligation to the Zionist regime and Germany’s ‘reason of state’ – Israel’s security – makes it impossible for the country to fulfil its obligations to the ICC.”
But in reality, Germany is not in a dilemma at all; such a dilemma could exist only between two equally important imperatives for action. In this case, however, the ICC’s judgement is the only imperative for action, marking a binding legal obligation.
No one can reasonably believe in the fairytale of Germany’s moral responsibility anymore, as the country defends, finances, arms and supports the genocide of Palestinians
Germany’s alleged “reason of state”, on the other hand, is nothing more than a chimera – a morally exaggerated quasi-religious idol that the whole world shall believe in and that shall justify and legitimise the state’s unrestricted support for Israel. This transparent strategy intends to make the world, and Germans in particular, believe that the country has a “moral obligation” to side with the Zionist regime, thus concealing its true geopolitical, economic, military and financial interests.
Claiming to act on moral grounds “without alternative”, while supporting and justifying crimes committed by the Zionist regime, has been a policy that worked well for Germany for decades. But after 16 months of the Gaza genocide, the situation has changed.
No one can reasonably believe in the fairytale of Germany’s moral responsibility anymore, as the country defends, finances, arms and diplomatically supports the genocide of Palestinians, in addition to the bombing of Lebanon, Yemen and Syria, while shielding those responsible from accountability.
Invoking Germany’s “reason of state” offers no escape from the country’s binding obligation to the ICC. Rather, it is merely a sad spectacle that the world, and the Palestinian people in particular, have had to endure for far too long.
When former German Chancellor Angela Merkel announced in 2008 that Israel’s security was Germany’s “reason of state”, she attempted to derive a quasi-religious consecration for Germany from its prostration before the racist settler-colonial apartheid regime and thus aimed to lend greater legitimacy to a decades-long policy of unconditional support for the Zionist regime. Her morally and ideologically charged understanding of the term was directed at four specific audiences.
Firstly, to the global public, Merkel wanted to show Germany’s exemplary character, presenting it as a country that had learned lessons from its history and would forever stand by Israel, come what may. This announcement laid the foundations for all subsequent denials and rejections of Israel’s crimes.
Secondly, she was conveying to Israel, which had only recently begun its siege of Gaza, that it had a free hand to do whatever it wanted to the Palestinian people, with unlimited support. Germany thus backed Israel’s wars on Gaza in 2008-09, 2012, 2014 and 2021.
Thirdly, to Palestinian people, Merkel made it unmistakably clear that they could expect nothing from Germany. They were left with idle talk about human rights, feigned regrets about their “humanitarian situation”, and mendacious talk about a “two-state solution”, while Germany turned a blind eye to illegal Zionist settlements and land grabs in Palestine.
Finally, German citizens were meant to understand that from then on, there was “no alternative” to unconditional support for Israel.
From that point up until now, with the Bundestag’s adoption last November of the resolution “Never again is now: Protecting, preserving and strengthening Jewish life in Germany” – which relies on the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s controversial definition of antisemitism – we have seen a progressive subjugation of democracy to the needs of the Zionist regime, alongside a rise in the smearing of its critics with antisemitism allegations.
By stifling and criminalising criticism of Israel’s policies of war, torture and genocide, Germany has surrendered to the destructive, settler-colonial logic of elimination: German democracy today must conform to the contours of Zionism. Merkel’s making German democracy market-conform and Zionism-conform have been her greatest achievements in destroying quite a number of German citizens’ basic rights.
For Germany’s political class, mainstream media and primary institutions, the country’s “dignity” stems from its total support for Israel’s annihilation of the Palestinian people, and the repression of any dissent within the country. For a country with its own genocidal, settler-colonial and fascist past, what kind of a pathetic “reason of state” is that?
Instead of listening to endless talk about Germany’s “moral obligation” to the Zionist regime, we should focus instead on the state’s naked interests. Many German banks, insurance companies, investors, research institutions, universities and weapons firms are so intimately connected with Israel, that any change in Germany’s politics would inevitably result in losses to markets, profits and important knowledge.
There are fears of losing the Palestine laboratory, from which Germany, in times of neoliberalism, learns so much – from surveillance technology to managing populations, to drone and AI warfare.
Germany is interested in what the settler-colonial logic of elimination against the indigenous Palestinian population has produced over the decades, as neoliberalism progresses and constantly produces new superfluous masses to control. The techniques to achieve this will come from Israel’s decades of oppressing the Palestinian people.
Protecting these interests is the real German „reason of state“, concealed behind an ideological veil of an alleged historical responsibility for a genocidal regime.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.
Alastair Crooke : Balance of Power in the Middle East https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LV-RWDCLDSM
Die Türkei wird sich gegen Israel stellen… Iran zeigte beim Gegenangriff der Israelis, dass sie eine überlegene Luftabwehr haben…
Tulpenweg 11, 38108 Braunschweig
Tel: +49 531 350513
Mobile: +49 176 577 47 881
Web: helmutkaess.de
Weitere Infos: ippnw.de | sicherheitneudenken.de | leuchtturmard.de
Dr. med. Helmut Käss, Arzt für Allgemeinmedizin i.R.
http://www.friedenszentrum.info/
In less than 24 Hours EVERYTHING changes for The United States | Redacted w Clayton Morris https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYcCncwUGtY
Am 1.1.25 (?) sagt Russland-Expertin Frau Krone-Schmalz Vernichtendes! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNmGvhYaBS4
EILMELDUNG! Russland-Expertin Sagt UNFASSBARES! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNmGvhYaBS4
Berliner Zeitung zu Meinungsfreiheit und Elon Musk
finden eine fundierte Bestätigung durch einen der versiertesten Kritiker der Beschränkung der Meinungsfreiheit, der indirekt auch der IPPNW den Spiegel vorhält: https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/kultur-vergnuegen/zum-fall-elon-musk-habecks-wunsch-nach-einer-staatlichen-steuerung-der-meinungsbildung-ist-totalitaer-li.2285703.